Size

Smaller but better!

Buy, rent or build smaller

Small homes drastically reduce carbon footprints and costs, fostering simpler living and greater financial freedom.

The size of your home significantly impacts its sustainability, and not just because larger homes require more materials to build and maintain. Consider the environmental implications: a larger home means higher energy usage for heating, cooling, and lighting. And it’s not just the footprint of the home itself, but also the carbon footprint. A smaller house means less space to accumulate unneeded items, promoting a minimalist lifestyle that leads to less consumption and waste. Smaller homes also demand less land, aiding in the preservation of green spaces and reducing urban sprawl. When you choose to live in a smaller home, you are making a proactive choice for sustainability. You’re voting with your dollars against wasteful construction practices and excessive energy usage. You’re embracing a lifestyle that values quality over quantity and champions environmental stewardship. In the fight against climate change, every square foot counts.

Actions

Buy, rent or build smaller

Key Concepts:

1Energy Efficiency

Larger homes generally require more energy for heating, cooling, and lighting, significantly contributing to your carbon footprint. In 2020 the U.S. Energy Information Administration reported that “the average household living in a single-family detached home consumed nearly three times more energy than a household living in an apartment building that has five or more apartments”. Prioritizing energy efficiency and reducing home size can play a critical role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The energy demand of larger homes makes them less sustainable, contributing significantly to global carbon emissions. Smaller homes, with less space to heat, cool, and light, consume less energy, resulting in a lower carbon footprint.

Fact: In 2020, the average household living in a single-family detached home consumed nearly three times more energy than a household living in an apartment building that has five or more apartments.

2Resource Consumption

The size of a home also impacts the amount of raw materials used in construction. Larger homes demand more wood, steel, concrete, and other materials whose production and transportation have significant environmental impacts. Smaller homes, on the other hand, reduce this resource consumption, contributing less to deforestation and mineral depletion. Construction of larger homes requires more raw materials, contributing to deforestation and mineral depletion. Smaller homes reduce this resource consumption, making them more sustainable.

Fact: According to a study by the Forest Stewardship Council, building a 2,500 square foot house requires 16,000 board feet of lumber.

3Waste Generation

Larger homes often produce more waste, both during construction and throughout their lifecycle. More square footage equates to more materials discarded during renovation and demolition. Smaller homes, therefore, can mitigate waste generation and the environmental burden of waste disposal. Bigger homes produce more waste during construction, renovation, and demolition. By opting for a smaller home, you minimize waste and alleviate the environmental burden of waste disposal.

Fact: The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 600 million tons of construction and demolition debris were generated in the U.S. in 2018.

4Water Usage

Bigger homes usually have more bathrooms, larger kitchens, and perhaps even amenities like pools or large lawns. This typically leads to increased water usage, a significant factor given the increasing scarcity of fresh water in many regions of the U.S. Larger homes usually equate to increased water usage due to more bathrooms, kitchens, and amenities like pools or large lawns. Smaller homes promote water conservation.

Fact: The American Water Works Association reports that the average American household uses over 300 gallons of water per day.

5Cost

Larger homes cost more to build, maintain, heat, cool, and renovate. By contrast, a smaller home can offer significant savings. The reduced costs associated with smaller homes can free up resources for investments in renewable energy or other sustainable technologies. Larger homes cost more in every respect: building, maintenance, heating, cooling, and renovation. A smaller home can offer significant savings and free up resources for sustainable investments.

Fact: The National Association of Home Builders estimates that for every $1,000 increase in the price of a median-priced home, 153,967 households are priced out of the market.

6Urban Sprawl

Larger homes consume more land area, often contributing to urban sprawl, habitat destruction, and longer commutes. Smaller homes can promote more compact, transit-oriented development, reducing carbon emissions from transportation and preserving natural habitats. Large homes require more land, contributing to urban sprawl, habitat destruction, and longer commutes. Smaller homes can foster more compact, transit-friendly communities.

Fact: The EPA states that compact development can reduce vehicle travel by 20-40%.

7Design Flexibility

A smaller home offers greater design flexibility to maximize space efficiency and optimize comfort. Innovative design solutions can make a small space more livable and even luxurious. Thoughtfully designed small homes can better satisfy occupants’ needs while minimizing environmental impact. Smaller homes allow for innovative design solutions to maximize space efficiency and comfort. Thoughtfully designed small homes can meet occupants’ needs while minimizing environmental impact.

Fact: The ‘Tiny House Movement’ champions homes typically under 400 square feet, demonstrating how efficient design can maximize functionality in small spaces.

8Community Integration

Smaller homes can encourage denser, walkable neighborhoods, fostering community connections. Larger homes, particularly in suburban or exurban settings, can lead to social isolation. Smaller homes in densely populated areas promote social interaction and accessibility to community amenities. Smaller homes encourage denser, walkable neighborhoods, fostering stronger community connections. They promote social interaction and easy access to community amenities.

Fact: Research has shown that people living in walkable neighborhoods are more socially active and report higher levels of trust and engagement in their community.

9Resilience

Smaller homes can be more resilient to climate change. They are easier to retrofit for energy efficiency, easier to heat or cool during power outages, and, if properly sited and designed, potentially less vulnerable to climate-related disasters. Smaller homes can be more resilient to climate change, being easier to retrofit for energy efficiency and easier to heat or cool during power outages.

Fact: ccording to the Department of Energy, buildings smaller than 10,000 square feet typically achieve energy savings of 35% through retrofits.

10Lifestyle and Wellbeing

Living in a smaller home encourages a simpler, clutter-free lifestyle, potentially enhancing mental wellbeing. The process of downsizing can promote mindful consumption, reducing the stress associated with excess possessions, and fostering appreciation for experiences over material possessions. Living small encourages a simpler lifestyle, potentially enhancing mental wellbeing. Downsizing promotes mindful consumption, reducing the stress associated with excess possessions.

Fact: According to a study in the Journal of Consumer Psychology, individuals who place less value on materialistic pursuits report higher levels of satisfaction in life.

In conclusion, home size is a crucial factor in achieving sustainable living. While smaller homes can provide economic and environmental advantages, they also offer the opportunity to embrace a less materialistic and more mindful lifestyle. This shift aligns with global efforts towards decarbonization, climate resilience, and social justice. To learn more about the benefits of small homes and sustainable living, consider visiting the Tiny Life website (https://thetinylife.com/) or the Small House Society (https://smallhousesociety.org/). Both offer resources, success stories, and practical advice on downsizing and living small.

Special Considerations for Affordable Housing Projects:

1Cost Efficiency

The primary goal of affordable housing projects is to provide cost-effective accommodation. Smaller homes require fewer resources to build, maintain, and operate, making them more economical. Cost savings can be used to support more housing units or higher-quality constructions.

2High-Density Development

Smaller homes enable higher-density development, allowing more units on a given piece of land. This is particularly important in urban areas where land is expensive and scarce. Higher density can also support public transit use, reducing transportation costs for residents.

3Design Quality

While smaller homes may be more affordable, they should not compromise on quality of life. Clever design strategies can maximize space utilization, provide adequate natural light, and ensure privacy.

4Community Building

Compact development promotes a sense of community. Smaller homes can foster community interaction, providing opportunities for shared amenities like communal gardens or playgrounds, which can enhance the quality of life for residents.

5Sustainability

Smaller homes use fewer resources and generate less waste, both in construction and operation. Implementing energy-efficient designs and sustainable materials in these projects not only reduces environmental impact, but also saves on utility bills, further supporting the affordability for residents.

In affordable housing projects, balancing economic constraints with the need for quality, sustainable housing is essential. Reducing home size is a viable strategy to meet these objectives, enabling cost savings, higher density, quality design, community building, and sustainability.